http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4685054.stm
So my question is, is there a way for scientists to measure and estimate the effects of burning things up in our atmosphere? I mean, could we feasibly rocket a bunch of waste into space, set it in a decaying orbit, and let the super-heated atmosphere burn it into oblivion? Would it release harmful materials into the air? Would it destabilize the atmosphere? The ionosphere? The stratosphere? Would it be cost-effective to build vehicles for the sole purpose of waste reduction?
On that last point, I think I'd have to answer in the affirmative. If we can justify spending $billions on destructive programs, we should be willing to spend as much in an effort to save our planet. Yes, I know that sounds like the stereotypical tree-hugger line. But right now, it's the only planet we've got, and considering how badly we're treating it, I don't think I'm crazy for suggesting we look for alternatives like this one.
At the very least, they should hireme someone to research the possibility.
So my question is, is there a way for scientists to measure and estimate the effects of burning things up in our atmosphere? I mean, could we feasibly rocket a bunch of waste into space, set it in a decaying orbit, and let the super-heated atmosphere burn it into oblivion? Would it release harmful materials into the air? Would it destabilize the atmosphere? The ionosphere? The stratosphere? Would it be cost-effective to build vehicles for the sole purpose of waste reduction?
On that last point, I think I'd have to answer in the affirmative. If we can justify spending $billions on destructive programs, we should be willing to spend as much in an effort to save our planet. Yes, I know that sounds like the stereotypical tree-hugger line. But right now, it's the only planet we've got, and considering how badly we're treating it, I don't think I'm crazy for suggesting we look for alternatives like this one.
At the very least, they should hire